Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Tue 23rd Sep 2008 21:46 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 331276
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by moleskine
by moleskine on Wed 24th Sep 2008 18:28
in reply to "RE: Comment by moleskine"
Google is not saying anything with this phone gosh. Google does the software other companies do the hardware as much you cant blame google if the hardware is bad.
Of course you can hold Google to account, and you should. Who makes what has nothing to do with it. This will always be seen as a "Google phone", as Google and world +dog know quite well. Google have a brand and a rep to protect. First rule of that is you don't put your name to something that doesn't live up to your image. And if you do, you take the flak.
As it happens, I think blame is a futile activity, in this as in other walks of life. By the looks of things, this just isn't a very good phone unless you are really really keen on Google apps, and its price is close enough to the iPhone to let folks think "I might as well get an iPhone anyway". However, if a head of steam builds up around Android then we can expect much better and slicker phones to come in 2009.




Member since:
2008-09-24
Google is not saying anything with this phone gosh. Google does the software other companies do the hardware as much you cant blame google if the hardware is bad.