To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm right there with you on users' perceptions of "high priced" apps. I guarantee you at least a few of these same users who balk at paying $1 for a functional, useful iPhone app were paying $2 or more for a single animated .GIF file from Jamster on their previous phone.
Now that I've had a BlackBerry for a little while, I've found that there are very few free or even cheap (under $10) apps worth having on that platform. This stands in stark contrast to my past experience with the iPhone and PalmOS based phones. Given that the BlackBerry uses Java apps almost exclusively, I don't see why there aren't more good ports. I guess the advantage to this is that there is no central clearing-house for apps; RIM isn't going to delete my third party address book app next time I sync just because it's better than the inbuilt version.




Member since:
2007-02-08
I agree with you, it's a not the right attitude from Apple, but it's far from being a major issue for developers. Developers care about the number of apps they sell and how they could finish their app ASAP (and without bugs too).
99.9% of the developers are not concerned by a kind of censorship and are aware of the risk
99.9% of the users are very happy with Spore and iBeer
and half of user's comments are about price (0.99$ is always too much...)
That's life.