Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Sep 2008 07:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 331333
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
I'm right there with you on users' perceptions of "high priced" apps. I guarantee you at least a few of these same users who balk at paying $1 for a functional, useful iPhone app were paying $2 or more for a single animated .GIF file from Jamster on their previous phone.
Now that I've had a BlackBerry for a little while, I've found that there are very few free or even cheap (under $10) apps worth having on that platform. This stands in stark contrast to my past experience with the iPhone and PalmOS based phones. Given that the BlackBerry uses Java apps almost exclusively, I don't see why there aren't more good ports. I guess the advantage to this is that there is no central clearing-house for apps; RIM isn't going to delete my third party address book app next time I sync just because it's better than the inbuilt version.