Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Sep 2008 07:50 UTC
Apple The situation regarding Apple's App Store for the iPhone is getting weirder by the day. Several applications have been rejected from the App Store based on seemingly dubious claims such as duplication of functionality (even though they didn't duplicate anything), or alikeness to default applications. Two such cases made headline news over the past few days; Podcaster and MailWrangler. The developers of these applications openly protested against these rejections, and apparently, Apple doesn't really like that. Apple now reiterates that rejections fall under the NDA, prohibiting developers from speaking up about rejections.
Thread beginning with comment 331333
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Morgan
Member since:
2005-06-29

I'm right there with you on users' perceptions of "high priced" apps. I guarantee you at least a few of these same users who balk at paying $1 for a functional, useful iPhone app were paying $2 or more for a single animated .GIF file from Jamster on their previous phone.

Now that I've had a BlackBerry for a little while, I've found that there are very few free or even cheap (under $10) apps worth having on that platform. This stands in stark contrast to my past experience with the iPhone and PalmOS based phones. Given that the BlackBerry uses Java apps almost exclusively, I don't see why there aren't more good ports. I guess the advantage to this is that there is no central clearing-house for apps; RIM isn't going to delete my third party address book app next time I sync just because it's better than the inbuilt version.

Reply Parent Score: 2