Linked by David Adams on Wed 24th Sep 2008 22:44 UTC, submitted by snydeq
Thread beginning with comment 331475
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-06-24
And to add to your comment.. Thinking with the logic this guy uses: Since Intel's shares are @ ~$18/share, and Google's is ~$442/share, that means Google must be 25x bigger AND better than Intel.. Hmmmmm. I DON'T think so. Market capital for Intel: $105 billion, while Google's is $139. Sure seems like they're 25x bigger to me ....