A Windows developer and Sysadmin has compiled a "Watch List" of the small but annoyingly important things to keep in mind when moving from 32 bit Windows to Windows x64.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2008-09-10
You're right, there are some people who don't need to go 32-bit, and could probably stay that way for several more years.
In my case, and in the case of anyone who's building large-scale apps, the extra memory is a life-saver.
In another case, there are applications (like Microsoft Exchange 2007) that are being released as 64-bit only applications. That's definitely a minor occurrence, but I had to help someone out with that exact situation.
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:2007-03-04
I am in the same situation. A year ago, I installed Vista x64 on a high-end computer and I didn't feel any difference in terms of speed because basically, I use only Opera, Adobe Reader and MS Office.
However, in the case of David, it's different because he is dealing with servers that can need a lot of memory in some cases. High-end servers can be dramatically relieved with the extra memory unleashed by the x64 architecture.
But unless we are forced to migrate to x64, I don't see any compelling reason to migrate to x64 on the desktop for regular users who don't use professional applications (CAD, 3D, audio, video).
Member since:
2005-07-06
No argument there, but why run 64 bit now, when there are these headaches?
I tried it with linux for a while before I realized it was a waste of time for me. I never bothered with 64 bit xp or vista.