Linked by David Adams on Mon 29th Sep 2008 02:58 UTC, submitted by AdamW
Thread beginning with comment 331874
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Moulinneuf
by AdamW on Mon 29th Sep 2008 21:12
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Moulinneuf"






Member since:
2006-01-16
Can you please explain to me, in detail, how RedHat would have _damaged_ the Linux desktop? Or are the news articles you pointed to enough for you to make this claim?
I'm not a fan of RedHat, and, frankly, I think their distro sucks. But your claim is really bold.
Even if other big players, like Novell (and in a questionable way!) are more into the desktop market than RedHat, how does the absence of RedHat impose any damage?