To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, no. ASP.NET is pretty good - certainly no worse than JSP or PHP. The benefit of ASP.NET is that it allows real RAD design (Okay, I love absolute positioning, so sue me!) and the potential code reuse of a properly designed engine between a desktop and web app is extremely productive (okay, Java has this too, but hey!.)
ASP.NET has a bad rap, because those who are clueless think "ASP" is an element of the ASP.NET runtime. Well, no, it isn't at all like that. Comparing ASP to ASP.NET is like comparing a Instant coffee to premium ground.
Exactly, and JSP and PHP are also awful. It is much easier to write code and maintain code when you structure it well and separate your business logic from your display.
While you can do this to some degree with ASP.NET, JSP, and PHP, they all encourage poor development practices by making it easier to program incorrectly.
Another thing that I think is stupid about ASP.NET is the lack of complete support for it found in VisualStudio. For example, ASP.NET supports multiple levels of template inheritance, but VisualStudio only supports one level of inheritance (this may be different now, but it was one of several limitation of the IDE in past versions).
Also, I don't confuse ASP.NET with ASP. Everyone knows ASP is absolutely worthless. ASP.NET has some value at least. However, if I personally were going to use one of these languages, I'd chose PHP over ASP.NET or JSP; but that's just me.
Edited 2008-10-02 18:31 UTC






Member since:
2005-07-05
Anyway, web applications may very well mean ASP.NET and C#.
I certainly hope not. In my opinion, using ASP.NET & C# for web sites is only slightly more elegant than creating web sites in FrontPage.