Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 1st Oct 2008 22:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 332181
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Don't tell me about Cinepaint! Rowe promised the new generation Cinepaint in days/weeks and it tool YEARS to release something that is far from usable...
Cinepaint was used in professional environments like Dreamworks (I mean, "FilmGimp" was...) and so in a time where not many applications supported hi depth channel file formats (at this point, it was no more than a GIMP fork with better file format support and file sequence support... but that's about it). But almost every single professional application support these formats (Cineon, DPX, OpenEXR, etc) these days. CinePaint is forgotten in professional environments, as a victim of ostracism and lies.
Rest in pieces CinePaint...





Member since:
2007-02-17
Good point. I didn't know about Cinepaint. It looks as though it solves GIMP's lack of support for more than 8 bits per channel, but that it doesn't solve GIMPs GUI issues.
http://www.cinepaint.org/about.html
Shame about the GUI though:
http://www.cinepaint.org/pix/linux/index.html
Anyway, the more solutions the better, I believe. This way, more people are likely to find what they want. It is also more valuable counterpoint to the FUDsters who would still to this day try to claim that "you can't do professional photo editing on Linux".