Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Thu 2nd Oct 2008 20:50 UTC
PC-BSD Recently the PC-BSD team released their latest stable version (PC-BSD 7) code-named Fibonacci Edition. Some of major changes from the previous version include a newer kernel, an experimental ZFS module, and a KDE 4 for desktop environment. Being a Linux junkie, I thought of this as a perfect opportunity to venture into the BSD arena.
Thread beginning with comment 332330
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Why KDE?
by tuaris on Fri 3rd Oct 2008 18:09 UTC
tuaris
Member since:
2007-08-05

I know this is flame bait, but...

KDE Yuk!

Why can't someone make a BSD OS in pure GNOME for the the people that really matter.

Reply Score: -6

RE: Why KDE?
by BluenoseJake on Fri 3rd Oct 2008 18:34 in reply to "Why KDE?"
BluenoseJake Member since:
2005-08-11

Perhaps you could just install Gnome? It's in the ports system, and then uninstall KDE, and poof, a BSD Gnome system. That's the beautiful thing about FOSS, if you don't like it, tweak it, change it, rearrange it.

And If you like any sort of customization at all, Gnome is horrible. The people who matter like to customize things, hence KDE.

Edited 2008-10-03 18:36 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE: Why KDE?
by irbis on Fri 3rd Oct 2008 18:50 in reply to "Why KDE?"
irbis Member since:
2005-07-08

Many BSD-based operating system projects seem to prefer KDE over GNOME. There may be many reasons, but one reason seems to be that KDE may be easier to manage and package, according to many, which matters to small projects with few developers and maintainers.

Also some Linux distributions, Slackware, GoboLinux etc. have preferred KDE over GNOME for the same reason. Slackware's Patrick Volkerding explains the reasons for dropping its GNOME support here: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/10/27/1098667821639.html

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: Why KDE?
by Soulbender on Fri 3rd Oct 2008 18:56 in reply to "RE: Why KDE?"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

but one reason seems to be that KDE may be easier to manage and package


KDA is also, at least according to the OpenBSD folks, easier to port to non-Linux systems with good results.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE: Why KDE?
by Luminair on Sat 4th Oct 2008 04:37 in reply to "Why KDE?"
Luminair Member since:
2007-03-30

ouch

that is harsh

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Why KDE?
by zombie process on Sat 4th Oct 2008 15:46 in reply to "Why KDE?"
zombie process Member since:
2005-07-08

Or they could shit into a cardboard box and stuff it into a pbi. You know, for the the people that really matter.

Reply Parent Score: 3