Linked by David Adams on Fri 3rd Oct 2008 15:24 UTC
Legal Gutsy/foolhardy Mac clone maker Psystar responded in August to Apple's copyright infringement lawsuit with an anti-trust lawsuit against Apple. Earlier this week, Apple's lawyers filed a motion to have the suit dismissed, calling it "deeply flawed." In its statement, Apple contends: "One of the bedrock principles of antitrust law is that a manufacturer's unilateral decision concerning how to distribute its product and with whom it will deal cannot violate the Sherman Act."
Thread beginning with comment 332350
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: The motion...
by aent on Sat 4th Oct 2008 00:33 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: The motion..."
aent
Member since:
2006-01-25

No license is required to redistribute anything. The law grants you that right. You just aren't allowed to make copies of it. If you go to Walmart and buy all of their pizzas, including their own store brand, and open up your own store and sell it, you have every right to do that. You can even do it at a greater price and try to make a profit if you like. Nobody can deny your right to do that. It is still Walmart's product so you can advertise it as such, and you own it, so you can sell it.

The problem comes into play if you open up the boxes, modify the boxes, and then try to resell them. Then its not Walmarts product anymore as you modified it, so you cannot violate their copyright and trademark.

Reply Parent Score: 4