Linked by David Adams on Sun 5th Oct 2008 02:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 332434
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Look, lets face it, there are problems with drivers in Vista. Is that Microsoft's fault? No.
Creative drivers come to mind from my own experience. I don't blame Microsoft at all. I blame Creative.
Creative drivers come to mind from my own experience. I don't blame Microsoft at all. I blame Creative.
It is as much Microsoft's fault as any hardware incompatibility on Linux is Linux's fault.
Does that change your views at all?
If not, then i'm with you on this one.
RE[4]: run XP on Vista
by StephenBeDoper on Mon 6th Oct 2008 19:47
in reply to "RE[3]: run XP on Vista"
Look, lets face it, there are problems with drivers in Vista. Is that Microsoft's fault? No.
If there are driver problems in Linux, say with a Broadcomm wireless device ... who to blame then? Until recently Broadcomm refused to release drivers for Linux, even though Broadcomm had them, and even though a customer had paid for their device (say as part of a laptop purchase) and that customer wanted to run Linux.
Yet most "internet gurus" would want to blame Linux for that.
If Linux cops it for poor driver support, even when it is clearly not the fault of Linux, then so too (by the same illogic) should Vista cop the blame when it has poor drivers.






Member since:
2005-12-15
Look, lets face it, there are problems with drivers in Vista. Is that Microsoft's fault? No.
Creative drivers come to mind from my own experience. I don't blame Microsoft at all. I blame Creative.
Edited 2008-10-05 11:35 UTC