Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Oct 2008 10:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 332781
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
you mean theses thing then mandriva, suse, xandros.... done before this compagny started?
And how popular are these distros again compared to Ubuntu? The importance of desktop work is only measured by its effect; if it's not effective then it's worthless. You can be delusional all you want, but it's still a fact that Canonical managed to gain much more market share. And for a good reason. As long as there are people like you around who keep denying things like this, Linux will never succeed on the desktop. Stop being emotionally attached to Mandriva/SuSE/Xandros and start seeing that Canonical managed to do things none of them have succeeded in, namely greater desktop acceptance of Linux.
Edited 2008-10-07 14:06 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-15
you mean theses thing then mandriva, suse, xandros.... done before this compagny started?