Linked by Rahul on Sat 11th Oct 2008 01:39 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 333256
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As an outside observer the development does seem slow - Ooo has not yet got the functionality of MS Office 2000, Although for many tasks Ooo is adequate it's not as good as it should be.
When there are only two companies actually working full time on it - are you surprised? Novell and Sun are doing as much as they can with the limited resources - its time for the vendors who do bundle it with their respective distributions to actually allocate some man/person power to the project.
Well, there is only one company working on MS Office, too, and there's only one company working on iWork
. But it looks as if Sun is slowly downscaling their development effort on OOo, and OOo is unlikely to be ever a popular project for volunteers to work on, even if it became truly open and community oriented, because of the size and complexity of the codebase, the weirdness of the buildsystem, the amount of unfamiliar technologies used -- technologies that are only used in OOo. But then, as a KOffice developer, I _would_ say that, wouldn't I :-)







Member since:
2006-02-22
As an outside observer the development does seem slow - Ooo has not yet got the functionality of MS Office 2000, Although for many tasks Ooo is adequate it's not as good as it should be.
Edited 2008-10-11 06:55 UTC