Linked by David Adams on Sat 11th Oct 2008 16:48 UTC, submitted by IndigoJo
Thread beginning with comment 333306
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Before you get rid of C++ ....
by Accident on Sat 11th Oct 2008 17:55
in reply to "RE: Before you get rid of C++ ...."
Well D comes pretty close to what he's looking for.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_programming
RE[3]: Before you get rid of C++ ....
by wanker90210 on Sat 11th Oct 2008 18:23
in reply to "RE[2]: Before you get rid of C++ ...."
Personally I have high hopes for Vala:
http://live.gnome.org/Vala
That's the first project in years that has made me really excited.
RE[2]: Before you get rid of C++ ....
by aesiamun on Sat 11th Oct 2008 23:13
in reply to "RE: Before you get rid of C++ ...."
RE[3]: Before you get rid of C++ ....
by luzr on Sat 11th Oct 2008 23:18
in reply to "RE[2]: Before you get rid of C++ ...."








Member since:
2008-08-24
And most importantly, must be 99% C-compatible.
My experience is, for a small application that doesn't do anything the base class library doesn't provide, C# is indeed much faster to code. But as the code complexity grows and you need access to some C API then C# really is a hassle.
Good C++ libraries (like boost, Qt, OpenSceneGraph, etc) does a lot to smooth out the development experience.
Edited 2008-10-11 17:26 UTC