Linked by David Adams on Sat 11th Oct 2008 16:48 UTC, submitted by IndigoJo
Thread beginning with comment 333345
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Before you get rid of C++ ....
by luzr on Sat 11th Oct 2008 23:18
in reply to "RE[2]: Before you get rid of C++ ...."
RE[4]: Before you get rid of C++ ....
by aesiamun on Sat 11th Oct 2008 23:19
in reply to "RE[3]: Before you get rid of C++ ...."
RE[4]: Before you get rid of C++ ....
by werpu on Mon 13th Oct 2008 10:36
in reply to "RE[3]: Before you get rid of C++ ...."
Objective-C does not have too much common with C++ design goals.
Objective-C just adds a bit of smalltalk syntax over C. Whereas C++ extends C syntax while keeping low-level efficiency.
BTW, note that there is Objective-C++ too
Objective-C just adds a bit of smalltalk syntax over C. Whereas C++ extends C syntax while keeping low-level efficiency.
BTW, note that there is Objective-C++ too
Well there are two different design principles. Objective-C followed the keep it simple principle while C++ followed the, lets take every feature there is on earth and press it into the language approach. The problem is, that the keep it simple approach always is superior. Java could have never taken off if not a huge number of projects simply failed on C++s inherent complexity! Java sort Next was able to pull of a decent component based system in time with ObjectiveC while most others had inherent delays (COM etc...) or failed entirely in their first incarnations (Project Pink from Apple and IBM) is a clear sign of the overcomplexity of the design. The funny thing is that the better C++ based systems basically follow the keep it simple principle and omit a huge load of the language to reduce themselves down to the sane core!





Member since:
2005-06-29
Well, we have objective-c...
It is C, and then smalltalk came in and started influencing it to be object oriented.
"Come on kid, everyone's doing it!"