Linked by David Adams on Sat 11th Oct 2008 16:48 UTC, submitted by IndigoJo
General Development Eric Raymond is working on an essay, putatively titled "Why C++ Is Not My Favorite Programming Language". In his announcement, he calls it "an overcomplexity generator", "bloated, obfuscated, unwieldy, rigid, and brittle", and alleges that these characteristics appear in C++ applications also. I contend that many of the complaints about C++ are petty or are aimed at specific libraries or poor documentation and that many of the features commonly regarded as unnecessary (and excluded from intended replacements) are, in fact, highly useful. C++: the Ugly Useful Programming Language
Thread beginning with comment 333391
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Of course, Pascal for LEARNING? Who'd have thunk it? .

You'd be surprised. My schooldays from 6th grade up until highschool graduation saw us go through pre-PC machines up and over gw/q/turbo basic, turbo/borland pascals, turbo c/c++, borland then ms c++, but looking back, I think we spent the most time with pascal, which was nice (thinking back).

I find most of today's complainers, who applaud about one and cry over another language's strengths and weaknesses, not really worthy of spending much time with. They don't like one ? I couldn't care any less. When we (and I) had to solve a problem, choosing a language was the last step I ever took. Sometimes it matters less, sometimes it matters more, you always have to have some reason for picking one, besides personal preference.

But pascal, well, always remains one love of mine ;)

Reply Parent Score: 3