Linked by Rahul on Mon 13th Oct 2008 21:19 UTC
Linux Linux Foundation is organizing a end user collaboration summit this week. A major topic will be a presentation on the new upcoming filesystems - Ext4 and Btrfs. Ted Tso, who is a Linux kernel filesystem developer on a sabbatical from IBM working for Linux Foundation for a year, has talked about the two-pronged approach for the Linux kernel, taking a incremental approach with Ext4 while simultaneously working on the next generation filesystem called btrfs. Read more for details.
Thread beginning with comment 333644
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: ZFS?
by Arun on Tue 14th Oct 2008 15:45 UTC in reply to "RE: ZFS?"
Arun
Member since:
2005-07-07

"Shame that license issues has blocked ZFS adoption in Linux distros.

Hmmmmmm. Funny. My recollection is that Linux's usage of the GPL pre-dates both ZFS and the CDDL, and Sun knew fine well what it was doing when it started using the CDDL for selected bits of software.
"

If Sun had used GPL, other OSes like MacOS, *BSD and QNX couldn't have ported ZFS or other Solaris tech. Sun chose a more open license to spread the tech around. Too bad Linux users are so selfish.

Edited 2008-10-14 15:53 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: ZFS?
by FunkyELF on Tue 14th Oct 2008 17:49 in reply to "RE[2]: ZFS?"
FunkyELF Member since:
2006-07-26

BSD License...done

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: ZFS?
by segedunum on Tue 14th Oct 2008 20:50 in reply to "RE[2]: ZFS?"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

If Sun had used GPL, other OSes like MacOS, *BSD and QNX couldn't have ported ZFS or other Solaris tech.Sun chose a more open license to spread the tech around.

So what's the problem with what they did with Java and dual licensing then? Sorry, but that doesn't really wash.

Too bad Linux users are so selfish.

No, they just want to keep code flowing into their project rather than out of it so they can keep the code open ;-).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[4]: ZFS?
by Arun on Tue 14th Oct 2008 22:22 in reply to "RE[3]: ZFS?"
Arun Member since:
2005-07-07

"If Sun had used GPL, other OSes like MacOS, *BSD and QNX couldn't have ported ZFS or other Solaris tech.Sun chose a more open license to spread the tech around.

So what's the problem with what they did with Java and dual licensing then? Sorry, but that doesn't really wash.
"

Why doesn't the Linux community dual license if it needs Solaris tech?

"Too bad Linux users are so selfish.

No, they just want to keep code flowing into their project rather than out of it so they can keep the code open ;-).
"

How did you come to that illogical conclusion? Real data shows Solaris IP is flowing very well to other projects. The license is far more open than the GPL.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: -1

RE[3]: ZFS?
by muszek on Wed 15th Oct 2008 23:55 in reply to "RE[2]: ZFS?"
muszek Member since:
2007-04-25

Yeah, it's a real shame you can't http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-licensing">dual the code.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1