Linked by Rahul on Mon 13th Oct 2008 21:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 333644
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If Sun had used GPL, other OSes like MacOS, *BSD and QNX couldn't have ported ZFS or other Solaris tech.Sun chose a more open license to spread the tech around.
So what's the problem with what they did with Java and dual licensing then? Sorry, but that doesn't really wash.
Too bad Linux users are so selfish.
No, they just want to keep code flowing into their project rather than out of it so they can keep the code open ;-).
"If Sun had used GPL, other OSes like MacOS, *BSD and QNX couldn't have ported ZFS or other Solaris tech.Sun chose a more open license to spread the tech around.
So what's the problem with what they did with Java and dual licensing then? Sorry, but that doesn't really wash. "
Why doesn't the Linux community dual license if it needs Solaris tech?
"Too bad Linux users are so selfish.
No, they just want to keep code flowing into their project rather than out of it so they can keep the code open ;-). "
How did you come to that illogical conclusion? Real data shows Solaris IP is flowing very well to other projects. The license is far more open than the GPL.
Yeah, it's a real shame you can't http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-licensing">dual the code.







Member since:
2005-07-07
Hmmmmmm. Funny. My recollection is that Linux's usage of the GPL pre-dates both ZFS and the CDDL, and Sun knew fine well what it was doing when it started using the CDDL for selected bits of software. "
If Sun had used GPL, other OSes like MacOS, *BSD and QNX couldn't have ported ZFS or other Solaris tech. Sun chose a more open license to spread the tech around. Too bad Linux users are so selfish.
Edited 2008-10-14 15:53 UTC