Linked by Adam S on Tue 14th Oct 2008 12:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 333652
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not version 7, is the 7th release of Windows, or is it?
by Soulbender on Tue 14th Oct 2008 16:59
in reply to "RE: Not version 7, is the 7th release of Windows, or is it?"
RE[2]: Not version 7, is the 7th release of Windows, or is it?
by dagw on Tue 14th Oct 2008 18:57
in reply to "RE: Not version 7, is the 7th release of Windows, or is it?"
that is because these are the version numbers behind windows. though i thought windows 7 was actualu going to be 6.1. much like xp was 5.1 to windows 2000's 5.0.
Anybody familiar with Linux should have no problem accepting that the kernel has a different version nr. than the distro. I mean Linux is at 2.6.something while Fedora is at version 9.




Member since:
2005-07-13
just to clerify what you said, for those who don't know about the kernel numbering in windows. if you have ever been into safe mode you will notice up at the top of xp it says 5.1 and vista it says 6.0
that is because these are the version numbers behind windows. though i thought windows 7 was actualu going to be 6.1. much like xp was 5.1 to windows 2000's 5.0.
Edited 2008-10-14 16:05 UTC