Linked by Adam S on Wed 15th Oct 2008 15:20 UTC, submitted by rlem6983
Features, Office The news of OpenOffice.org's third major release has generated quite a bit of buzz on the internet for many reasons, one of which being that it now runs natively on a Mac (sans X11). ZDnet has posted a screenshot gallery of OpenOffice.org 3.0 for those who have yet to try the hot-off-the-press application.
Thread beginning with comment 333925
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Luminair
by lemur2 on Thu 16th Oct 2008 00:18 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Luminair"
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

True, hopefully Office 2007 will come out which will mean out of the box ODT/ODF support.


You can of course get out of the box ODT/ODF support with OpenOffice right now.

I have been told that Office 2007 SP2 (which is apparently available now) also implements ODT/ODF support ... although I haven't heard any assesment of it in any report or review so far, so I cannot comment on how reliable or compliant it is.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: Comment by Luminair
by kaiwai on Thu 16th Oct 2008 00:39 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Luminair"
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

"True, hopefully Office 2007 will come out which will mean out of the box ODT/ODF support.


You can of course get out of the box ODT/ODF support with OpenOffice right now.
"

Of course, but *I SAID* that *OFFICE 2007* WILL GET IT SOON. Do you have problems understanding basic English? Dear god, what is it with people here having problem understanding basic English?

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: Comment by Luminair
by google_ninja on Thu 16th Oct 2008 00:43 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Luminair"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

You heard that from me, I didn't have the time to reply back, and then forgot about it. SP2 isn't out yet, it'll be out in 2-3 months. I got confused with SP1, which has been out for awhile (and I never really get open office docs so it isn't a big thing for me)

ODF 1.1 and PDF 1.5 should be fully supported. IMO PDF support is a much bigger thing then ODF, since it seems to mean they are just giving up with pushing XPS as a serious format.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Comment by Luminair
by sbergman27 on Thu 16th Oct 2008 01:08 in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Luminair"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

ODF 1.1 and PDF 1.5 should be fully supported.

At the risk of putting Kaiwai's perception of my basic English skills in yet greater peril, it will be very interesting to see what the word "fully" will mean in this context.

IMO PDF support is a much bigger thing than ODF, since it seems to mean they are just giving up with pushing XPS as a serious format.

MS unable to foist a new format upon desktop users? I agree. That is interesting.

Edited 2008-10-16 01:10 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Comment by Luminair
by Jemm on Thu 16th Oct 2008 10:20 in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Luminair"
Jemm Member since:
2005-07-25

IMO PDF support is a much bigger thing then ODF, since it seems to mean they are just giving up with pushing XPS as a serious format.


I haven't seen any signs of MS dropping XPS. Microsoft just couldn't earlier include the PDF-exporter with Office 2007, since Adobe didn't want them to.

However, it has been a downloadable plugin since the release. XPS has been downloadable plugin, too, but probably because of antitrust reasons.

Now that PDF is standarded by ISO, Microsoft can include the PDF-support in Office without Adobe's permission.

Reply Parent Score: 1