To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It won't be ready for the desktop. It is still in development.
Oracle, Red Hat, IBM and Novell want something that has even more features than ZFS (when combined with a logical volume manager).
But it will take until 2010 until you will see it in production. Maybe the next RHEL will ship it. That is just a guess though.
Hmm .... i don't think you will see brtfs in 2010 in real production. The development of a totally new filesystem is a longer process. Just think about the time ext needed to get production ready. Or the fact that reiserfs is still suspected to loose files when loaded with millions of files. brtfs it's not like ext[1-4], which is a evolutionary development, it's something completely new.
BTW: The whole brtfs development looks like a "Oh, heck, we need something similar to ZFS ...". I hope they make a better job with brtfs as with systemtap. And i do not believe that the ZFS development will stop ... in 2010 ZFS will have more features, too.
Edited 2008-10-18 18:11 UTC
Doubt it.
I'd venture and guess that RHEL will continue using ext3 by default, but will offer ext4 is a certain command line option is used during installation/boot.
If indeed btrfs will be released within 2010, I -may- end up in RHEL 7.
- Gilboa





Member since:
2005-07-07
Seems like BTRFS is much more along the lines of a modern filesystem like ZFS or Reiser4.
If BTRFS is to be merged in 2.6.29, would it be stable enough for desktop use then? Though not suitable for critical production use.