Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Oct 2008 15:58 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes Here at OSNews, we use a moderation system where your peers rate your comments, and where the OSNews staff rarely intervene. This system was put in place after realising that the editorial moderation was failing miserably; it had become too much work. Sifting through ten reported comments a day is one thing, sifting through 100 of them each day is another. The result was that editorial moderation had become willy-nilly, which led to understandable user frustration, and pointless email rants back and forth between users and staff members (mea culpa). The answer to this problem turned out to be a two-step process: banning anonymous commenting, and our peer moderation system. While the moderation system has its flaws, it has exceeded all of our expectations in making sure that our comments' sections are free of spam, and relatively fun to read. Still, we realise problems exist, but we also see a lot of misinformation floating around. The treat we have in store for you today will help in fixing some of that.
Thread beginning with comment 334284
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

He's got you there, Thom. You can't turn the moderation over to the users, publicize the "fact", and then go right back to arbitrary, dictatorial moderation whenever you feel like it. And that is what you, Thom, do. And you really need to stop it. For the good of OSNews.


He hasn't got me at all. "+1, informative" comments fall squarely within the definition of spam, and as such, I remove them. As simple as that. Read the OSNews forum rules, and they're pretty clear.

As for dictatorial moderation - get over it already, dude. The stats don't lie: the OSNews staff doesn't affect moderation IN ANY WAY. There is no dictatorial moderation - only in your head.

Reply Parent Score: 1

sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

"""
There is no dictatorial moderation - only in your head.
"""

You responded with lightning speed to that. I wonder why you felt the need? I suspect that you recognized the truth in my observations. You do moderate in a dictatorial fashion, or at least you threaten to. I'm not certain that you actually do it. And I'm not sure threatening vs doing makes a difference.

Reply Parent Score: 2

PlatformAgnostic Member since:
2006-01-02

If Thom's a dictator, I'd say he's a pretty benevolent one.

Reply Parent Score: 2