Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Oct 2008 14:19 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems Netbooks use various types of processors, but most of them are built around Intel's Atom processor and architecture. There are more exotic options, such as the Chinese Longsoon processor, but those are quite rare and hard to come by - and certainly not as powerful. Apparently, another contender is preparing to enter the netbook processor market. Say hello to ARM.
Thread beginning with comment 334690
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
sanctus
Member since:
2005-08-31

Are you defining good web experience by it's ability to surf youtube?

Edited 2008-10-23 14:41 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

_txf_ Member since:
2008-03-17

Isn't adobe porting flash onto arm? They have to as the iphone and pretty much any mobile device runs arm based cpus.

Either way they have somewhat of a head start as flash lite(a subset of full flash) runs on arm so I can't imagine it being too difficult.

Also given that these proposed cpus will be considerably beefier, there will be fewer performance considerations.

Edited 2008-10-23 14:51 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

hobgoblin Member since:
2005-07-06

optionally there is gnash.

tested it recently and seems to work quite well.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

mallard Member since:
2006-01-06

The Nokia internet tablets are ARM Linux and have full flash support, so support already exists, it's just not made generally available.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

1c3d0g Member since:
2005-07-06

Knowing Adobe, by the time they finish porting Flash to ARM, x86 would already be the dominant platform for cellphones.

Edited 2008-10-23 20:58 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

UZ64 Member since:
2006-12-05

Are you defining good web experience by it's ability to surf youtube?

Looks that way, but you gotta admit, in most (dumb) computer users' minds, there's some truth to that. People seem to get hooked on YouTube for whatever reason and can't seem to go without it, or they'll have a fit. Personally, I wish YouTube would get rid of all the damn Flash and all that fancy crap and give us an old-fashioned link to a proper video file (ahhh... the good 'ol days...), but that'll never happen. At least give us an option, but they want to make it as complicated as possible to "save" one of their videos and be able to watch it off of their site.

IMO, Flash sucks (bigtime), but it's mostly required to appease all the brainwashed people out there who have had it forced upon them by sites requiring it and their computer's OEMs preinstalling it to the sight of dollar signs. And YouTube took its popularity and turned it into something that's here to stay. It's like Intel and Microsoft... Flash and YouTube... they've both reached mass popularity, and they both depend on each other (for the most part), and they will both continue to fuel each other.

Edited 2008-10-23 20:02 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

"Are you defining good web experience by it's ability to surf youtube?

Looks that way, but you gotta admit, in most (dumb) computer users' minds, there's some truth to that. People seem to get hooked on YouTube for whatever reason and can't seem to go without it, or they'll have a fit. Personally, I wish YouTube would get rid of all the damn Flash and all that fancy crap and give us an old-fashioned link to a proper video file (ahhh... the good 'ol days...), but that'll never happen. At least give us an option, but they want to make it as complicated as possible to "save" one of their videos and be able to watch it off of their site.

IMO, Flash sucks (bigtime), but it's mostly required to appease all the brainwashed people out there who have had it forced upon them by sites requiring it and their computer's OEMs preinstalling it to the sight of dollar signs. And YouTube took its popularity and turned it into something that's here to stay. It's like Intel and Microsoft... Flash and YouTube... they've both reached mass popularity, and they both depend on each other (for the most part), and they will both continue to fuel each other.
"

Linux can play flash video, on any architecture you please.

Use either Gnash or SWFdec.

I'm not sure if it works as a plugin currently with firefox ... I have had it working before, but last time I tried it didn't work.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

wannabe geek Member since:
2006-09-27

Are you defining good web experience by it's ability to surf youtube?


Sounds like a great definition to me ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

steve_s Member since:
2006-01-16

Are you defining good web experience by it's ability to surf youtube?


Absolutely.

For most surfers the ability to see online video is an essential part of the experience. This generally means Flash.

In an ideal world, HTML5 would be complete, have standard (widely used and unencumbered) codecs defined for audio and video tags, and be widely deployed, and thus there would be no need for Flash. It's not.

Most surfers don't care about standards, they just want things to work. Those of us that do care are a tiny almost insignificant minority.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

-ujb- Member since:
2005-10-21

"Are you defining good web experience by it's ability to surf youtube?


Absolutely.

For most surfers the ability to see online video is an essential part of the experience. This generally means Flash.
"

For this task flash video is enough - and that's supported in MPlayer.
I use Youtube a lot on my MorphOS system. And there I don't have a proper Flash support (unfortunately), but flash video is not a show stopper since MPlayer does it perfectly.

Personally I'd rather like to see a ppc based netbook (would really like to use MorphOS on a mobile device), than on an ARM (but that's just fine, too).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1