Linked by Rahul on Thu 23rd Oct 2008 14:25 UTC
ServerWatch writes about the slow but sure death of UNIX by the onslaught of Linux and customers moving from older proprietary UNIX systems to commercially supported open source enterprise Linux distributions.
"Linux does have one killer feature that is driving the switch: lower cost. Many companies are discovering Linux to be extremely attractive from a cost perspective. Take the experience of Sabre, a travel company that replaced Solaris with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) running on x86 machines, resulting in lowering costs 90 percent (with a three-fold speed gain to boot). These potential cost savings, which include hardware maintenance costs savings, are not to sniffed at."
Thread beginning with comment 334788
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Why Linux vs UNIX?
by TechGeek on Thu 23rd Oct 2008 21:09
in reply to "RE[2]: Why Linux vs UNIX?"
Member since:2006-01-14
RE[4]: Why Linux vs UNIX?
by sbergman27 on Thu 23rd Oct 2008 21:35
in reply to "RE[3]: Why Linux vs UNIX?"
Member since:2005-07-24
May I ask a question? Overall, how is this sub-thread likely to benefit the world? I, personally, do not see how it is likely to. These Linux vs *BSD threads are, in my opinion, non-constructive. They hurt all communities involved. We need to learn when to ignore any perceived trolling from whichever side we consider to be the "other" one and remember that we are, essentially on the *same* side. And walk away from these silly and useless exchanges.
Edited 2008-10-23 21:37 UTC
RE[4]: Why Linux vs UNIX?
by Wowbagger on Fri 24th Oct 2008 01:39
in reply to "RE[3]: Why Linux vs UNIX?"
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:
2008-04-08
Not almost!