Linked by Rahul on Thu 23rd Oct 2008 14:25 UTC
Linux ServerWatch writes about the slow but sure death of UNIX by the onslaught of Linux and customers moving from older proprietary UNIX systems to commercially supported open source enterprise Linux distributions. "Linux does have one killer feature that is driving the switch: lower cost. Many companies are discovering Linux to be extremely attractive from a cost perspective. Take the experience of Sabre, a travel company that replaced Solaris with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) running on x86 machines, resulting in lowering costs 90 percent (with a three-fold speed gain to boot). These potential cost savings, which include hardware maintenance costs savings, are not to sniffed at."
Thread beginning with comment 334872
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Raymond Noorda
by Moulinneuf on Fri 24th Oct 2008 12:43 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Raymond Noorda"
Moulinneuf
Member since:
2005-07-06

"Moulineuf is so ridicules he is a self parody"

Real man have no trouble ridiculizing themself , not that I am ridicule here , because you never *laugh* at my ridicule post ... You don't get that there is more then one point of view to every discussion.

"Awhile back I used to try and enumerate all the OSNews terms of use that he was violating in his posts "

As I said then and now , None , the fact you don't get it is rather interesting , some people are "special cases" and don't have to follow the rules other have to at all the time. I am sure you did the math and are still shaking your water head that I am still able to post here ...

"personal attacks, inflammatory language, etc) but he just doesn't get it."

How can I be personal with a coward named Google Nina ?

"but he just doesn't get it."

Am I not getting it or are you not getting it ?

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Raymond Noorda
by google_ninja on Fri 24th Oct 2008 15:43 in reply to "RE[3]: Raymond Noorda"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

I. No gratuitous use of profanity, biting sarcasm, or personal disparagement, especially directed at individuals.


It is rare that you do not personally disparage the person you are talking to.


II. No personal attacks on story authors, other readers, or news editors of this web site.


Not only do you disparage them, but you tend to attack them to.


III. Even if you are in violent disagreement or have strong feelings, find a way to keep your comments calm, and try to explain your reasoning, instead of just ranting.


I don't think I have ever read a comment by you which isn't you flipping the hell out.

IV. OSNews is not just an open source news web site, and it is not just an "alternative" OS site. Do not post comments that merely disparage a particular OS or company. Some examples of sentiments that are in violation of this rule: "Microsoft Sucks!", "Apple is dead!", "People who use KDE should be shot!", etc. If you hate Microsoft, or Apple, or Linux, or whatever, you may still talk about your hatred on OSNews, but please do so with reasoned, on-topic arguments.


You troll every single bsd story posted on this site

According to the rules, the Admins should have banned you ages ago. Many people will break one of those rules here or there, I don't think anyone else breaks four every single time they post.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Raymond Noorda
by Moulinneuf on Fri 24th Oct 2008 16:53 in reply to "RE[4]: Raymond Noorda"
Moulinneuf Member since:
2005-07-06

"It is rare that you do not personally disparage the person you are talking to. "


http://www.osnews.com/user/uid:266/comments

reality disagree with your lies ...

"Not only do you disparage them, but you tend to attack them to. "


http://www.osnews.com/user/uid:266/comments

reality disagree with your lies , again ...

"I don't think"


Something we can both agree on ...

"I have ever read a comment by you which isn't you flipping the hell out. "


It's seem the problem is you here , I post and I am always flipping out according to you ... analysis show I am never flipping out.

" You troll every single bsd story posted on this site "


http://www.osnews.com/comments/19947

http://www.osnews.com/comments/20031

http://www.osnews.com/comments/20104

This very Article and thread

Title : "Linux's Next Victim"

http://www.serverwatch.com/eur/article.php/3779821

not a single BSD in the article yet : there is above 10 BSD mention without counting mine ...

"According to the rules,"


None of witch I Broke ... Maybe there is a page 2 and 3 and 4 to the rule that you don't know about.

"the Admins should have banned you ages ago."


The reason : because Google Ninja ( or insert other name here ) the coward don't like Moulinneuf and is comment apparently is not a valid one.

"I don't think anyone else breaks four every single time they post. "


I agree you don't think , if your interested in the banned , suspended and other statistic contact the site admins ...

Edited 2008-10-24 17:03 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1