Linked by Rahul on Thu 23rd Oct 2008 14:25 UTC
Linux ServerWatch writes about the slow but sure death of UNIX by the onslaught of Linux and customers moving from older proprietary UNIX systems to commercially supported open source enterprise Linux distributions. "Linux does have one killer feature that is driving the switch: lower cost. Many companies are discovering Linux to be extremely attractive from a cost perspective. Take the experience of Sabre, a travel company that replaced Solaris with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) running on x86 machines, resulting in lowering costs 90 percent (with a three-fold speed gain to boot). These potential cost savings, which include hardware maintenance costs savings, are not to sniffed at."
Thread beginning with comment 334899
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Raymond Noorda
by Moulinneuf on Fri 24th Oct 2008 16:53 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Raymond Noorda"
Moulinneuf
Member since:
2005-07-06

"It is rare that you do not personally disparage the person you are talking to. "


http://www.osnews.com/user/uid:266/comments

reality disagree with your lies ...

"Not only do you disparage them, but you tend to attack them to. "


http://www.osnews.com/user/uid:266/comments

reality disagree with your lies , again ...

"I don't think"


Something we can both agree on ...

"I have ever read a comment by you which isn't you flipping the hell out. "


It's seem the problem is you here , I post and I am always flipping out according to you ... analysis show I am never flipping out.

" You troll every single bsd story posted on this site "


http://www.osnews.com/comments/19947

http://www.osnews.com/comments/20031

http://www.osnews.com/comments/20104

This very Article and thread

Title : "Linux's Next Victim"

http://www.serverwatch.com/eur/article.php/3779821

not a single BSD in the article yet : there is above 10 BSD mention without counting mine ...

"According to the rules,"


None of witch I Broke ... Maybe there is a page 2 and 3 and 4 to the rule that you don't know about.

"the Admins should have banned you ages ago."


The reason : because Google Ninja ( or insert other name here ) the coward don't like Moulinneuf and is comment apparently is not a valid one.

"I don't think anyone else breaks four every single time they post. "


I agree you don't think , if your interested in the banned , suspended and other statistic contact the site admins ...

Edited 2008-10-24 17:03 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: Raymond Noorda
by sbergman27 on Fri 24th Oct 2008 17:16 in reply to "RE[5]: Raymond Noorda"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

because Google Ninja ( or insert other name here ) the coward don't like Moulinneuf

Ye Gods. How shall I say this?

Moulinneuf, you don't present a very likable personality on this site. Be nice. Be respectful of others' opinions. Respectfully disagree with them when you do disagree. And others would treat you differently. You would be better listened to. Your thoughts would be taken more seriously. And you would do more good for the causes which you obviously believe in deeply. (You and I share some of those.)

One other thing that is possibly related. The spelling of your name is difficult to remember. I'm pretty good with spelling and I *always* have to verify whether I got it right. (Sometimes I get lazy and do not verify it.) It would be easier to remember if both the 'l' and the 'n' were double consonants. Then there is the 'ou' and the 'eu'. That combination gives a lot of people trouble. It's a sort of spelling roller-coaster. Misspelling of your name, which is actually a pretty cool one in my opinion, should not be taken as an insult. Just thought I should make that clear.

-Steve

Edited 2008-10-24 17:22 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2