Linked by Rahul on Thu 23rd Oct 2008 14:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 334906
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Linux marketing is getting even more aggressive
by sergio on Fri 24th Oct 2008 23:23
in reply to "RE: Linux marketing is getting even more aggressive"
No FC or multi-pathing support? Are you sure? Then how are all my Linux boxes on a fully meshed FC network going to a EMC storage array right now? It must be a miracle!
Miracle?! Linux's FC support is a nightmare: closed source drivers, binary incompatibility between minor kernel versions, vendor dependent tools, etc.
Linux needs a stable kernel ABI to be "Enterprise ready" and compete with UNIX.
RE[3]: Linux marketing is getting even more aggressive
by rajj on Sat 25th Oct 2008 00:40
in reply to "RE[2]: Linux marketing is getting even more aggressive"
RE[2]: Linux marketing is getting even more aggressive
by dvzt on Sat 25th Oct 2008 00:21
in reply to "RE: Linux marketing is getting even more aggressive"
Sure I'm sure! Linux is fully dependant on FC vendor's drivers and tools, which lack performancea and are not as tightly integrated with the system. They can't compete with the support Unices have, e.g. Leadville FC stack and MPxIO in Solaris 10 which are present by default. Solaris also installs with FC drivers. (Qlogic and Emulex at least)
RE[3]: Linux marketing is getting even more aggressive
by rajj on Sat 25th Oct 2008 00:36
in reply to "RE[2]: Linux marketing is getting even more aggressive"




Member since:
2005-07-06
No FC or multi-pathing support? Are you sure? Then how are all my Linux boxes on a fully meshed FC network going to a EMC storage array right now? It must be a miracle!