Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 25th Oct 2008 19:26 UTC, submitted by SK8T
Thread beginning with comment 335042
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The problem with Civil Unions is that to make it fair everyone that is "Married" under the law would no longer be so, and that would upset a great number of people as well. Calling a legal institution one thing for one group and one thing for a another is not right. IMHO its all or nothing we are all "Married" Legally or we are all "Civilly Joined"






Member since:
2005-07-18
Move marriage from the civil arena and let each belief system embrace whatever it may be and we wouldn't be in this mess.
Better would have been for the civil branch to create something akin to marriage legally and taxation wise, but simply not call it marriage, which you indirectly acknowledge as religious as well as civil. Civil Unions are the best course for that action.
However, that people were not content with Civil Unions points out that the goal is not civil recognition but religious recognition.