Linked by on Mon 27th Oct 2008 23:10 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu From the get-go, the company behind the popular Linux distribution Ubuntu - Canonical - has backed Ubuntu with Mark Shuttleworth's money. The big question has always been if Canonical is actually making any money. We have a rather clear and definitive answer to that one now.
Thread beginning with comment 335191
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Still Young
by stabbyjones on Tue 28th Oct 2008 03:28 UTC in reply to "RE: Still Young"
stabbyjones
Member since:
2008-04-15

as shuttleworth said they'll be focusing on services.

you want to use red hat you pay for support services. there's nothing stopping you putting centOS on but you don't get any help.

i imagine that's exactly what ubuntu will be. free while you pay for support costs.

business will pay for support where users won't.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Still Young
by Kwitschibo on Tue 28th Oct 2008 05:50 in reply to "RE[2]: Still Young"
Kwitschibo Member since:
2006-01-17

CentOS isn't without service!
CentOS is with service from the partner YOU want. You know a friend, student or partner which supports linux systems? Ask him if he can support your CentOS. Every Linux Supporter can Support technical a CentOS Network and he can Support the project to help the CentOS basic. And Canonical... Without Mark - Canonical is dead. Many words, many marketing und many buzzwords but no money.

Edited 2008-10-28 05:52 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[4]: Still Young
by Bit_Rapist on Tue 28th Oct 2008 06:42 in reply to "RE[3]: Still Young"
Bit_Rapist Member since:
2005-11-13

CentOS isn't without service!
CentOS is with service from the partner YOU want. You know a friend, student or partner which supports linux systems? Ask him if he can support your CentOS. Every Linux Supporter can Support technical a CentOS Network and he can Support the project to help the CentOS basic. And Canonical... Without Mark - Canonical is dead. Many words, many marketing und many buzzwords but no money.


I think the point being made is that enterprise support with Red Hat Linux costs money. CentOS may have a thriving community of users, but a friend or a student is not going to cut it for most major corporations.

I work for a large company and we have had software requirements that Open Source could have filled, and in some cases we have went with a proprietary vendor specifically because of the support contract.

I think Canonical is smart if they focus on enterprise services over the desktop distribution, its worked out well for RedHat.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: Still Young
by stabbyjones on Tue 28th Oct 2008 09:55 in reply to "RE[3]: Still Young"
stabbyjones Member since:
2008-04-15

you completely missed the point.

obviously ubuntu is nowhere without shuttleworth. he pretty much pays for everything as part of his rich guy philanthropy.

as far as community support goes that's not what a business is looking for in most cases and not what i was talking about...

Canonical isn't dead and while the only good choice i think they've made is base Ubuntu on Debian if earnings are increasing that usually means that the company isn't dead.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Still Young
by evangs on Tue 28th Oct 2008 07:04 in reply to "RE[2]: Still Young"
evangs Member since:
2005-07-07


i imagine that's exactly what ubuntu will be. free while you pay for support costs.

business will pay for support where users won't.


Which is why the OP said that they'll start focusing on the enterprise eventually, if they wish to become profitable. Selling services to end users is nice in theory but I don't think that it will pan out in practice.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[3]: Still Young
by segedunum on Tue 28th Oct 2008 10:02 in reply to "RE[2]: Still Young"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

as shuttleworth said they'll be focusing on services.

What sevices?

i imagine that's exactly what ubuntu will be. free while you pay for support costs. business will pay for support where users won't.

In the Linux world, Red Hat owns that market. Even Novell isn't managing to make much of a dent in it. Ubuntu need something different to make any waves, and they're not going to do it with what they're using.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2