Linked by David Adams on Wed 29th Oct 2008 20:55 UTC, submitted by Geir Johasen
Opera Software An interesting NYT Bits blog entry covers Opera's mobile browser. Buried in the middle of the article is this quote: "Opera's engineers have developed a version of Opera Mini that can run on an Apple iPhone, but Apple won't let the company release it because it competes with Apple's own Safari browser." It also talks about Opera on the Wii and browsers in cars. A good read. My Take: But back to the iPhone. As tempted as I am to just shrug it off, since Apple is free to run its App Store any way it pleases, as an enthusiastic iPhone user, I think Apple is shooting itself in the foot here, as it is with all the "competitive" apps being rejected. Apple does stand to lose some Google revenue by letting people use other browsers, but they have much more to gain by unleashing the creativity of the developer community and giving them the freedom to improve or replace core iPhone functionality. Hopefully competition from Android forces them to wake up.
Thread beginning with comment 335510
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Ridiculous
by ari-free on Wed 29th Oct 2008 22:02 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Ridiculous"
ari-free
Member since:
2007-01-22

I prefer freedom, thank you very much.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: Ridiculous
by melkor on Wed 29th Oct 2008 22:30 in reply to "RE[3]: Ridiculous"
melkor Member since:
2006-12-16

freedom? freedom for businesses to do whatever they like, at the expense of the "people". Sorry, I think of the people first, business last. A business NEVER has individualistic rights, and nor should it, because it cannot EVER be trusted with that. It's bad enough that business bloody interferes with governmental decisions, something that if any politician had a backbone, they'd be getting rid of. Our politicians ONLY pander to business.

As an example, the US 700 odd billion dollar bailout of rich *unts. *uck 'em. Let them sink. It was their own greed, and their own screwups that led them lending money to people who could never afford to pay back the loans that has caused this issues. It is well known that CEOs etc got hefty pay rises depending on how many loans were made, not how many were feasible. As a direct result of this, when the US economy goes South, it *ucks up the rest of the world.

I'm proudly extreme left, anti capitalism, anti US because those are the values that I believe in. I'm not some lemming who's been brainwashed like the rest of you poor bastards.

Dave

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[5]: Ridiculous
by ari-free on Wed 29th Oct 2008 23:13 in reply to "RE[4]: Ridiculous"
ari-free Member since:
2007-01-22

Sorry, I think of the people first


you're a fool if you think governments do. That's why we should support non profit organizations such as Haiku, mozilla and linux foundations.

Edited 2008-10-29 23:19 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Ridiculous
by Moochman on Wed 29th Oct 2008 23:18 in reply to "RE[4]: Ridiculous"
Moochman Member since:
2005-07-06

hmm i tend to be pretty left wing too but... ur definitely still a lemming. just a different species.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Ridiculous
by jlarocco on Thu 30th Oct 2008 00:37 in reply to "RE[4]: Ridiculous"
jlarocco Member since:
2005-09-14

It doesn't make sense to argue against capitalism and against the Wall Street bailout at the same time. The oposite of capitalism would be like a big government bailout for everybody, all the time.

Massive government intervention and regulation are the anti-thesis of capitalism.

Also, your apparent view that the government is always looking out for people is a bit naive. Politicians care about one thing: keeping their cushy jobs.

Reply Parent Score: 2