Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 31st Oct 2008 16:49 UTC, submitted by Michael
Thread beginning with comment 336010
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-06
Instead of recompiling the kernel, a better baseline for the lowest common denominator would be to run the 64-bit version of the OS (most new machines sold in the last 2-3 years are 64-bit capable). That way, you don't get both the kernel and binaries being dumbed down to an i386 set of opcodes, plus you may see some performance benefit over the 32-bit version. Yes, it'll use more RAM, but that's one thing that's very cheap nowadays.