Linked by Rahul on Sun 2nd Nov 2008 19:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 336043
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
True and that I have already pointed. Intel started supporting 3D with free and open source drivers merged into Xorg a long time back and they have drastically increased their market share. ATI has followed through as well. Before ATI, people were arguing for "secret sauce" and "patent worries". Now that ATI has opened up and VIA has as well recently, Nvidia is really the odd man out with not any valid excuses to do the same thing.
Convincing Nvidia is surely part of the agenda in this statement
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Kernel_Driver_Statement
Just because people know to make hardware, doesn't make them experts in being driver developers. Often, the opposite.
What? If you *do* make hardware, you know better than anyone about it to implement a driver. After all, most hardware is useless without drivers that interact with the OS. It's not like electronic engineers don't know C, or they lack programmers.







Member since:
2005-07-06
Sure, many vendors do exact that. Some vendors like Intel even get their drivers merged before they even release their hardware. What doesn't work is proprietary drivers. Whether the vendors make them or not is mostly irrelevant. Just because people know to make hardware, doesn't make them experts in being driver developers. Often, the opposite.