Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Nov 2008 19:25 UTC
Windows Microsoft's Professional Developers Conference might be over, but that doesn't mean news about Windows 7 suddenly stops coming in. We have news for you on the elusive MinWin kernel, which created a sort of crazy hype a year ago, and Rafael Rivera found a way to enable the new taskbar on the pre-beta build handed out to PDC attendees. This build, carrying number 6801, didn't have the latest taskbar revamp - you needed a newer build for that, build 6933, which hasn't been released to the public.
Thread beginning with comment 336187
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: The Core of Windows
by kragil on Mon 3rd Nov 2008 21:54 UTC in reply to "The Core of Windows"
Member since:

600 mb for just the OS. "Not bad."

But Vista is _NOT_ for everybody. You always have to check your application compatibility. It is crazy.

For example: I "upgraded" a architect friend of mine to Vista. She got XP and Vista with her 1GB RAM Core Duo Laptop. So I upgraded the RAM to 2GB and installed Vista SP1.

I just assumed Apps would work... Well most of the stuff she had was not Vista ready. AutoCad 9 and other stuff with Dongle copy protection _WILL NOT_ fly with Vista. No Chance. You have to buy new versions or better solution:

Go back to XP.

Conclusion: Proprietary vendors mostly suck.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: The Core of Windows
by riha on Tue 4th Nov 2008 20:19 in reply to "RE: The Core of Windows"
riha Member since:

Actually, no need to criticize Vista when you in this case did it the wrong way.

As for all upgrades, for all different OS:es or applications, it is up to you to check the compatibility before doing the upgrade.

If something doesn´t work after upgrading and you find out that the app is not compatible, then you didn´t make your homework.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: The Core of Windows
by BluenoseJake on Wed 5th Nov 2008 13:10 in reply to "RE: The Core of Windows"
BluenoseJake Member since:

Considering how old Autocad 9 is, that's not exactly unexpected. A little research would have saved you a lot of headaches.

Reply Parent Score: 2