Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Nov 2008 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 336187
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Actually, no need to criticize Vista when you in this case did it the wrong way.
As for all upgrades, for all different OS:es or applications, it is up to you to check the compatibility before doing the upgrade.
If something doesn´t work after upgrading and you find out that the app is not compatible, then you didn´t make your homework.
RE[2]: The Core of Windows
by BluenoseJake on Wed 5th Nov 2008 13:10
in reply to "RE: The Core of Windows"




Member since:
2006-01-04
600 mb for just the OS. "Not bad."
But Vista is _NOT_ for everybody. You always have to check your application compatibility. It is crazy.
For example: I "upgraded" a architect friend of mine to Vista. She got XP and Vista with her 1GB RAM Core Duo Laptop. So I upgraded the RAM to 2GB and installed Vista SP1.
I just assumed Apps would work... Well most of the stuff she had was not Vista ready. AutoCad 9 and other stuff with Dongle copy protection _WILL NOT_ fly with Vista. No Chance. You have to buy new versions or better solution:
Go back to XP.
Conclusion: Proprietary vendors mostly suck.