Linked by Rahul on Tue 4th Nov 2008 06:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 336266
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: yet another useless fork
by qortra on Tue 4th Nov 2008 16:39
in reply to "RE[3]: yet another useless fork"
cruft has been removed from the [X.Org] codebase.
I absolutely know that is has, and I truly am grateful for the work they've done on it. However, speaking as a software engineer, sometimes a total rewrite is required to move ahead - refactoring has its limits. Moreover, this project appears to be a complete paradigm shift from the old-style X.Org server, and that might be what is called for to solve some of the problems mentioned in the article.
RE[5]: yet another useless fork
by VistaUser on Tue 4th Nov 2008 16:44
in reply to "RE[4]: yet another useless fork"
You, sir have not read This article:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html
(Or you have and disagree with it...)







Member since:
2006-01-02
Most of the cruft has been removed from the codebase. I'm sure there's still a lot left, but the devs are keeping pace with removing unused and unnecessary components from the codebase. Just today there were half a dozen commits removing crap from the server.