Linked by Rahul on Tue 4th Nov 2008 06:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 336284
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Umm, don't BSDs also use only (rarely anything else but) Xorg?
yes, as they are actual UNIXes and are bound to use it, as such otoh, they look more like server Os's to me, and don't seem to claim to be "ready for the desktop" as much as Linux does ;-)
Edited 2008-11-04 16:50 UTC
Umm, don't BSDs also use only (rarely anything else but) Xorg?
If this (or X12) moves on, it will be designed around kernel graphic memory management, kernel modesetting and multiple direct rendering clients. Other OSes will have to design, or port those bits to their kernel to support properly apps that use new features. They can choose to stay with X11 as well if they wish.
Currently "classic" direct rendering and Xorg userspace driver approach is okay for BSD/Solaris except for compiz+OpenGL app combination or for some OpenGL extensions.
Yes, this looks like a playground that tries to start design of a X11 protocol successor. Complex bits needed for the new approach are landing in kernel these days.




Member since:
2007-12-16
Umm, don't BSDs also use only (rarely anything else but) Xorg?