Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Nov 2008 15:47 UTC, submitted by umccullough
It seems that Haiku hacker Francois Revol (mmu_man) posted a few messages to a thread in MSI's forums asking to provide hardware with open specifications and/or (non-GPL) FOSS drivers such that alternative operating systems like Haiku and others could benefit and be supported as well. His messages were seemingly squelched by a forum moderator as "rubbish" while other, pro-Linux, postings seem to have remain untouched. Francois decided to respond with a public blog rant of his own opinions regarding the state of open source driver support and vendors' responsibility to their customers.
Thread beginning with comment 336410
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2006-10-06
No the use of "BSD's" block FREE operating systems. Apple is BSD based yet none of it's driver are useable by BSD/MIT. Microsoft is Full of BSD code , yet none of it's code and driver is usable.
Apple do deliever both code and money to the freebsd foundation.
The GNU/Linux BSD code is shared back and provided to the BSD/MIT daily.
How much code has gone back up the openssh project from the diffent linux distro's?
The GPL is compatible with BSD/MIT ( most of the approved OSI and FSF one that is ) , the BSD/MIT liar and thieve like to spread lie about it , but legally the too are compatible.
It's only compatible because the BSD licensed code turns gpl when combined with gpl licensed code. Something that would happen if gpl licensed code went back to the bsd's aswell.
The false theory and fear mongering that BSD will disappear because of the GPL is just that *False* , *theory* and *fear mongering*. If you look at reality they have no trouble using both GPL drivers and GPL software on a daily basis.
What gpl drivers are you talking about? And what gpl licensed code... Are you talking about the gcc which by the way is more or less on it's way out in both openbsd and netbsd.
1. There is no provision in GNU/Linux to block any other OS on anything.
Besides the licens ofcause.
2. The BSD/MIT OS and it's user enjoy GPL and Linux paid for software daily.
Such as?
3. BSD/MIT are there own killer by there own hubris and lack of everything.
The lack of everything havent stoped the linux distroes from getting their hands dirty in bsd licensed code.
4. BSD/MIT can start supporting there OS by reaching out to hardware maker instead of calling them names.
Who's doing the name calling?
5. Paying for support goes a long way. Creating your own seperate hardware channels and showing sales help too.
And who's paying for the hardware support in linux?
RE[2]: Why not use BSD's ...
by Moulinneuf on Wed 5th Nov 2008 22:23
in reply to "RE: Why not use BSD's ..."
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-06
No the use of "BSD's" block FREE operating systems. Apple is BSD based yet none of it's driver are useable by BSD/MIT. Microsoft is Full of BSD code , yet none of it's code and driver is usable.
The GNU/Linux BSD code is shared back and provided to the BSD/MIT daily.
The GPL is compatible with BSD/MIT ( most of the approved OSI and FSF one that is ) , the BSD/MIT liar and thieve like to spread lie about it , but legally the too are compatible.
The false theory and fear mongering that BSD will disappear because of the GPL is just that *False* , *theory* and *fear mongering*. If you look at reality they have no trouble using both GPL drivers and GPL software on a daily basis.
1. There is no provision in GNU/Linux to block any other OS on anything.
2. The BSD/MIT OS and it's user enjoy GPL and Linux paid for software daily.
3. BSD/MIT are there own killer by there own hubris and lack of everything.
4. BSD/MIT can start supporting there OS by reaching out to hardware maker instead of calling them names.
5. Paying for support goes a long way. Creating your own seperate hardware channels and showing sales help too.