Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Nov 2008 16:12 UTC, submitted by Michael
Thread beginning with comment 336444
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I was using Acorns and Amigas at the time too - Windows 3.x was terrible in comparison.
Unfortunately, even up until about 1998, my university only supported Win3.11 on their network (Netware, no less). Every now and then, they would send out emails telling people not to connect using Windows 95.
The best memory I have is of being able to dual-boot between Windows and Linux from a 1gb drive!




Member since:
2006-02-01
I'm a great one for computer nostalgia, but the simple fact is that Windows 3.1 was utterly terrible.
In those pre-Win95 days, I was a just a kid, using Acorn RISC-OS machines at school, and an Amiga 500 (later 1200) at home. I remember my dad splashing out hundreds of pounds on a powerful PC for work -- a 486SX/25, I think, with all of 4MB RAM -- and being utterly disgusted by how terrible "Windows for Workgroups" was compared to what I was used to.
*sigh*.
Those were the days...
(On the plus side though, it didn't take me long to work out how to play Doom on it!)