Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Nov 2008 11:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 336476
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Good points (like we can see from your comment score too). Done that way, Page 2 could be a very good idea.
On the other hand, in real life it might often be rather difficult to consider what is minor news only or only a gossip etc. - and thus maybe resulting in yet new row of complaints from some active readers... But everything has its pros and cons.
Personally I see Page 2 as a good way to improve the quality of this site.
On the other hand, in real life it might often be rather difficult to consider what is minor news only or only a gossip etc. - and thus maybe resulting in yet new row of complaints from some active readers...
Personally, I've always just ignored the stories I wasn't interested in, and read the ones I was. It's not like we have so many stories flying through here that it's hard to keep up.
I've observed that the complainers about content either just like to complain, or have an agenda. (i.e. suppress news about Ub^H^Ha distro they don't like.)
To me, "Page 2" seems like an organizational layer devoted to painting the bike-shed.
Edited 2008-11-09 19:39 UTC







Member since:
2005-11-10
Taking the current home page, here's the personal adjustments I would make as far as categorisation:
Move from Page 1 to Page 2
"Introducing Page Two"
(Reason: Meta)
"ReactOS 0.3.7 Released"
(Reason: Summary contains no feature details)
"Opera CEO: Mini Never Submitted to Apple"
(Reason: Gossip)
"Gruber: Opera Never Submitted Mini to Apple"
(Reason: Gossip)
Move from Page 2 to Page 1
"Benchmarks: Mac OS X 10.5 vs. Ubuntu 8.10"
(Reason: Independent Research)
"Lotus Symphony 1.2, Now with Mac OS X Support" (Maybe)
(Reason: Mac OS X support is a major, notable, feature difference)