Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Nov 2008 11:29 UTC
Benchmarks Phoronix compared the performance figures of Mac OS X 10.5.5 with those of Ubuntu 8.10. They conclude: "Apple's Mac OS X 10.5.5 Leopard had strong performance leads over Canonical's Ubuntu 8.10 Intrepid Ibex in the OpenGL performance with the integrated Intel graphics, disk benchmarking, and SQLite database in particular. Ubuntu on the other hand was leading in the compilation and BYTE Unix Benchmark. In the audio/video encoding and PHP XML tests the margins were smaller and no definitive leader had emerged. With the Java environment, Sunflow and Bork were faster in Mac OS X, but the Intrepid Ibex in SciMark 2 attacked the Leopard. These results though were all from an Apple Mac Mini."
Thread beginning with comment 336484
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Are they serious?
by karunko on Thu 6th Nov 2008 13:15 UTC
karunko
Member since:
2008-10-28

I mean, what's the point of the comparison if you're not doing it on the same hardware?!?

RE: Are they serious?
by yanik on Thu 6th Nov 2008 13:21 in reply to "Are they serious?"
yanik Member since:
2005-07-13

Are you serious? What's the point of commenting on an article if you didn't even read it?

We had used Apple's BootCamp to install Ubuntu 8.10 "Intrepid Ibex" on the Mac Mini.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 7