Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 7th Nov 2008 09:45 UTC, submitted by mlauzon
Internet Explorer Most of the popular browsers these days are based on one of the two open source rendering engines - khtml/WebKit and Gecko. The most popular browser, however, is based on proprietary technology: Internet Explorer. Even though IE made some progress during the past few years, it's no secret that it took Microsoft far too long to counter the success of Mozilla's Firefox. Currently, Microsoft is working (and thus, spending money) on Internet Explorer 8, and this prompted an audience member during a keynote by Steve Ballmer to ask an interesting question: is it worth spending money on IE, with so many open source engines readily available? Ballmer's reply may surprise you.
Thread beginning with comment 336592
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Same old MS
by lemur2 on Fri 7th Nov 2008 11:07 UTC in reply to "Same old MS"
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

This I interpret as. "For us, HTML is not the important part of the browser and using open source for this may could be a alternative to perhaps save some devlopment cost. But the important thing for our busniss are the (proprietary) extensions for IE(creating a lock in on our platform/thecnology)."

It sounds like the usuall embrace and extend MS has done for years.


That sounds pretty right to me also.

Unfortunately for Microsoft, it is precisely those proprietary extensions for IE that make it such an unmitigated security disaster.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 9

RE[2]: Same old MS
by ebasconp on Fri 7th Nov 2008 16:14 in reply to "RE: Same old MS"
ebasconp Member since:
2006-05-09

I think MS learned from its mistakes (proprietary extensions are one of them)....

Their last versions of their products point to the other side, trying to be 100% compliant with standards (for example, IE8 or Visual C++ 8)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3