Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Nov 2008 22:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 337044
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-06-28
that's not actually true! terra soft thrived *because* people wanted an alternative to os x! heck, the sole reason i continued to stick with ppc linux for so long was altivec! which, until the core-series intel chips, remained fairly unparalleled for certain tasks that a desktop user could need. for example, media creation. (and, that's my niche, fyi) i have an all OSS recording studio setup. additionally, i often transcode audio and video. the g4 and g5 series chips did a great job, at the time. i didn't actually leave the ppc linux desktop until january 2008!
so, there was quite a bit of time after os x was introduced that people were still running linux on ppc machines. as a matter of fact, many people started running linux as a leaner alternative to os x. mac os x was pretty sluggish and underwhelming until 10.3, imho.
of course, terra soft shifted focus to servers and HPC after the apple-intel switcheroo. but, they were doing fairly well with the desktop crowd until the final days of PPC macs.
Edited 2008-11-12 07:08 UTC