Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Nov 2008 08:51 UTC, submitted by RavinRay
Thread beginning with comment 337075
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-20
Considering how bad Parallels was before, I can believe 50%. VMWare Fusion 2.0 was a far, far better performer and used less memory too.
One thing I especially hated was Parallels NAT network performance...really bad, with tons of CPU use on 100 Mb.