Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Nov 2008 08:51 UTC, submitted by RavinRay
Mac OS X Yesterday, Parallels unveiled Parallels Desktop 4.0. The virtualisation tool for the Mac. Parallels allows you to run several operating systems 'on top' of Mac OS X, similar to VMware, Qemu, and other similar tools. Version 4.0 comes packed with new features and improvements.
Thread beginning with comment 337083
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
better than VMWare Fusion
by lqsh on Wed 12th Nov 2008 16:19 UTC
lqsh
Member since:
2007-01-01

Please help me decide which to buy - Parallels or Fusion

RE: better than VMWare Fusion
by REM2000 on Wed 12th Nov 2008 16:35 in reply to "better than VMWare Fusion"
REM2000 Member since:
2006-07-25

It's quite easy, purchase VMware for the simple fact that there feature rich updates are free of charge.

I purchased Parallels 2.0 and then paid for the upgrade to 3.0. The purchase to 3 was the most annoying as i had upgraded to leopard and needed 3 to get parallels to work. I know many will say that i didn't have to pay to upgrade to leopard so it's not technically parallels fault, however all of these things and more were given to the users of VMWare.

I know that the next time i have to pay to upgrade i will be switching to VMWare. I don't care for bling, i just need fast and stable windows virtualisation on the Mac.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: better than VMWare Fusion
by lqsh on Wed 12th Nov 2008 16:41 in reply to "RE: better than VMWare Fusion"
lqsh Member since:
2007-01-01

Does VMWare have that Coherence feature? Does it work well in Parallels?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: better than VMWare Fusion
by Arun on Wed 12th Nov 2008 18:22 in reply to "better than VMWare Fusion"
Arun Member since:
2005-07-07

I just got my first intel mac this week. I installed virtualbox 2.0 and have installed unbuntu, windows and opensolaris.

It works really well. I can't justify spending money on Parallels or Fusion.

Unless you really need the 3D support, virtualbox should meet your needs for free.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE: better than VMWare Fusion
by Kroc on Wed 12th Nov 2008 18:24 in reply to "better than VMWare Fusion"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

Both have free trials.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE: better than VMWare Fusion
by Moochman on Thu 13th Nov 2008 19:52 in reply to "better than VMWare Fusion"
Moochman Member since:
2005-07-06

I'm a happy Fusion user. Parallels' newest version has some nifty stuff that Fusion doesn't, most notably hardware-accelerated OpenGL support (they both have DX9), the ability to use removeable media from both OSes simultaneously, and the ability to browse files on/from either platform seamlessly (Fusion lets you browse Mac files on Windows but it's very slow, and it can browse Windows files from the Mac only when the Windows VM is shut down).

All this is really nice and enticing. But despite it all, VMWare is just rock-solid, and Parallels (at least in previous iterations) has not had nearly as good a record. Also, as mentioned the upgrade from Fusion 1.0->2.0 was free. That was a very nice early Christmas present this year ;) .

Parallels pioneered the Windows-on-Macintel market, and is still kicking out innovative products and spurring the market onward. More power to them. I'll wait to see what the reviews say about the new version's stability before recommending it to anyone, though.

Edited 2008-11-13 19:55 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2