Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Nov 2008 09:39 UTC, submitted by Reyk
Thread beginning with comment 337128
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-22
is based on isochronous transfer. What is the difference with FreeBSD? They hve some iso support but it is experimental nd slowly merged in mainline kernel. Do they use the same or there is a re-implementation?
About the friend talking about immaturities. I am GPL fan and against BSD licence. I use linux. But OpenBSD is exceptional because it is a source of drivers for other BSDs. Moreover it cooperates with other BSDs and is not writing incompatible code ala MS. I wish there was projects like GNU/kFreeBSD for Net/Open/Dragonfly-BSD. I also wish MidnightBSD worked on porting GNUstep/Etoile on OpenBSD and not doing a kernel re-write. Hopefully with OpenJDK they will have better userland tools to configure their systems.
I hate BSD ideologically but these folks are doing a tremendous job. Maybe one day Haiku enters this ecosystem.