Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Nov 2008 09:39 UTC, submitted by Reyk
Thread beginning with comment 337199
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: "Masturbating monkeys"?
by Soulbender on Thu 13th Nov 2008 10:57
in reply to ""Masturbating monkeys"?"
RE[2]: "Masturbating monkeys"?
by sakeniwefu on Thu 13th Nov 2008 12:21
in reply to "RE: "Masturbating monkeys"?"
Well, X runs perfectly fine on KVM/QEMU I cannot understand why people enjoy that limited proprietary clone.
However, I do not use X for my OpenBSD VMs I have them to test things I wouldn't dare to do in a real machine with real data inside.
No need for X - I have the Linux host for that.
I could probably use X as it was intended and pump apps into to my box but, as I usually just use the terminal, what I do is I forward a virtual port and communicate with it via ssh with the main tty on stdout. I have two nice puffy icons in my Xubuntu desktop, one for the "daemon" and another for the ssh sessions. Seamless desktop integration, I say.
Edited 2008-11-13 12:38 UTC





Member since:
2007-07-27
OpenBSD seems to come up nice, despite what other people says. OpenBSD runs in VirtualBox, yes? So it is easy to download and try?