Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th Nov 2008 13:32 UTC
Intel Not too long ago, Intel unleashed Nehalem, or Core i7, upon the world. The new Core i7 chips are not just new processors; they also introduce an entirely new platform, and this combination produces some impressive performance figures, according to Ars Technica. "The new performance gap between Nehalem and pretty much everything else of comparable cost is the result of upgrades to both the CPUs core architecture and the platform on which the multicore chip now runs." Respected in-depth review sites AnandTech and Tom's Hardware agree with Ars' findings.
Thread beginning with comment 337220
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Are People Going to Pay the Prices?
by segedunum on Thu 13th Nov 2008 15:17 UTC
segedunum
Member since:
2005-07-06

"Apparently, Intel is not so happy that buyers are purchasing inexpensive yet highly overclockable CPUs instead of the higher priced and faster models. To put a stop to the practice, Intel has ensured that only the $1,000 high-end model will operate beyond the TDP barrier of 130 W (110 A). The less expensive Core i7 versions - the 920 and 940 - will begin throttling back their clock speeds once they reach this threshold."

I'm afraid that's going to strike Intel out in the eyes of many, and people will simply be waiting for the cheaper and overclockable AMD response - even if it has slightly inferior performance.

Trust Intel to undo all the good work and give AMD the leg-up they've been giving them for years.

Edited 2008-11-13 15:18 UTC

BluenoseJake Member since:
2005-08-11

I agree 100%. This is a mistake on Intel's part. Oh well, I've been an avid AMD fanboi for a decade, and hopefully, they will be able to capitalize on it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

miscz Member since:
2005-07-17

Intel Core 2 processors overclock insanely well (especially the cheap ones) even with stock cooling so that's a processor to buy for price-sensitive folks.

AMD is pushed further and further away from the low-end market which was lately the only place they could compete. Soon Intel won't need overclock capability to fight with AMD.

I'm an AMD fanboy (won't go into extremes though ;) ) and bought black edition processor a year ago (mostly because I've already had AM2 motherboard) but I kind of regret that decission now :/

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

MamiyaOtaru Member since:
2005-11-11

"Apparently, Intel is not so happy that buyers are purchasing inexpensive yet highly overclockable CPUs instead of the higher priced and faster models. To put a stop to the practice, Intel has ensured that only the $1,000 high-end model will operate beyond the TDP barrier of 130 W (110 A). The less expensive Core i7 versions - the 920 and 940 - will begin throttling back their clock speeds once they reach this threshold."

I'm afraid that's going to strike Intel out in the eyes of many

Anandtech follows up:
The concern was that because of these TDP and current draw limitations, you would not be able to take lower end Core i7 processors and overclock them. The $999 Core i7-965 Extreme Edition doesn't have this problem as you can manually configure both the max TDP and current draw values, just like you can adjust its clock multiplier.

It turns out that the concerns are unfounded - all X58 motherboards should ship with a BIOS setting that tells the CPU to ignore its TDP/current limits.

- http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3453&p=2

Of course, it's possible that cheaper mobos won't have that setting, but all the Nehalem mobos so far seem to.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2