Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Nov 2008 21:38 UTC, submitted by pantheraleo
Thread beginning with comment 337407
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: MySQL and the future?
by Soulbender on Mon 17th Nov 2008 07:35
in reply to "RE: MySQL and the future?"
RE[3]: MySQL and the future?
by sbergman27 on Mon 17th Nov 2008 13:37
in reply to "RE[2]: MySQL and the future?"
What, you don't believe that table locks is a sufficient substitute for atomic transactions?
Nor that we should be inventing our own SQL "standard". MySQL shares much with PHP. It's easy for people who don't know any better, and are just learning programming, to get started with them. And by the time they've created big ugly messes with them, they've already become conditioned to that being normal, and don't see a problem.





Member since:
2005-07-24
I can't say I'd be completely disappointed if it did lose some of its mind-share. MySQL blows chunks compared to a couple of other FOSS RDBMS offerings. I've always been uncomfortable with having an inferior product as our FOSS DB poster child when our best and most feature-complete options should be getting the lime-light.