Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Tue 18th Nov 2008 20:35 UTC, submitted by abraxas
OSNews, Generic OSes "An alpha version of 64-bit Adobe Flash Player 10 for Linux operating systems was released on 11/17/2008 and is available for download. This offers easier, native installation on 64-bit Linux distributions and removes the need for 32-bit emulation." The pre-release can be downloaded from Adobe Lab Downloads.
Thread beginning with comment 337629
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
missleading
by poundsmack on Tue 18th Nov 2008 20:39 UTC
poundsmack
Member since:
2005-07-13

should read something like "Adobe resleases Alpha/Pre release 64 bit version of flash for linux"

adobe's flash suport with linux has been bad in the past (10 has been pretty good though so far). given past history though, installing anything labled Alpha that has to do with flash and linux just sounds like extra work and heart ache.

RE: missleading
by evangs on Tue 18th Nov 2008 21:02 in reply to "missleading"
evangs Member since:
2005-07-07

should read something like "Adobe resleases Alpha/Pre release 64 bit version of flash for linux"


I don't mean to be snide, but isn't that par for the course for the majority of FOSS software?

Incoming negative points!

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[2]: missleading
by JoeBuck on Tue 18th Nov 2008 22:40 in reply to "RE: missleading"
JoeBuck Member since:
2006-01-11

Adobe's stuff isn't FOSS, of course. If someone releases FOSS that is buggy and immature, others can fix it. Only Adobe can fix their own code.

The good news, though, is that since Adobe cares about x86-64 for Windows and Mac, they'll be highly motivated to fix any bugs found, and many of the bugs will be platform-independent.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: missleading
by Soulbender on Wed 19th Nov 2008 09:03 in reply to "RE: missleading"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

Yeah, it is sort of the opposite of commercial software companies that label software in an alpha state as a release. And expects you to pay for it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: missleading
by TQH ! on Tue 18th Nov 2008 21:05 in reply to "missleading"
TQH ! Member since:
2006-03-16

I do hope you meant headache and not heartache.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: missleading
by poundsmack on Tue 18th Nov 2008 21:09 in reply to "RE: missleading"
poundsmack Member since:
2005-07-13

can't it be both ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE: missleading
by jlarocco on Wed 19th Nov 2008 00:30 in reply to "missleading"
jlarocco Member since:
2005-09-14

I guess it depends on what you mean by "extra work and heart ache", but all I had to do was extract the .tar.gz into ~/.opera/plugins and restart Opera.

So far it seems to work at least as well as going through nspluginwrapper.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: missleading
by Punktyras on Wed 19th Nov 2008 11:24 in reply to "RE: missleading"
Punktyras Member since:
2006-01-07

I guess it depends on what you mean by "extra work and heart ache", but all I had to do was extract the .tar.gz into ~/.opera/plugins and restart Opera.


I had to do
$sudo cp libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/opera/plugins/
but result is the same - working like it should be looong time ago ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2