Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Nov 2008 19:19 UTC, submitted by AdamW
Thread beginning with comment 337665
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: This does actually fill a need
by lemur2 on Wed 19th Nov 2008 01:32
in reply to "RE[4]: This does actually fill a need"
I have run Mandriva + KDE 4.1 and MS Windows XP SP2 on the same machine, of the specification stated above (P4 11 GHz, 256 MiB) and I assure you that Mandriva is significantly slower and less responsive.
I have run Mandriva + KDE 4.1 and MS Windows XP SP2 on the same machine, and I assure you that XP SP2 is significantly slower and less responsive.
It heavily depends on the machine, I would suggest.
http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2008/09/on-kde4-performance.html
If KDE 4.1 is too heavy for your machine, and/or the machine does not have a correct GPU+linux driver for working 2D graphics acceleration under X11, then use either Mandriva + XFCE or Mandriva + LXDE to get better-than-XP performance.




Member since:
2005-12-12
I have run Mandriva + KDE 4.1 and MS Windows XP SP2 on the same machine, of the specification stated above (P4 11 GHz, 256 MiB) and I assure you that Mandriva is significantly slower and less responsive.