Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Nov 2008 19:19 UTC, submitted by AdamW
Thread beginning with comment 337671
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
The problem as I see it is people are putting in work on re-inventing the wheel again and again. Slapping their own badge on it and calling it a 'new distro'
But in this case it's not a new distro, Mandriva/Mandrake has been around for the better part of a decade. At most, it's a mod of an existing distro.
I see no indications that their goals were any more lofty than simply producing a version of Mandriva with XFCE installed by default/as the default DE.
It appears to have been an effort by the Mandriva community, so I don't see how it could detract from the development of Mandriva, let alone the cause of furthering linux as a desktop alternative.
nothing is new nor evolved.
At worst, that would mean that their efforts were unnecessary. I don't see what the practical problem is, beyond an arguably-poor use of time.
Which I still feel, it was not
I haven't contended that point, as I happen to agree.