Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Wed 19th Nov 2008 02:13 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Microsoft To address the growing need for a PC security solution tailored to the demands of emerging markets, smaller PC form factors and rapid increases in the incidence of malware, Microsoft Corp. plans to offer a new consumer security offering focused on core anti-malware protection.
Thread beginning with comment 337685
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by flanque
by flanque on Wed 19th Nov 2008 03:28 UTC
flanque
Member since:
2005-12-15

I for one believe this protection should be cheaper and if Microsoft wants to offer it for free which in turn drives down the prices of competing products then that's great for consumers.

I'd expect all the Microsoft haters out there to cry foul but in the end Microsoft has provided a platform which like it or not has a massive surface area for attack and they should be protecting their customers for free.

Of coarse it'd be better if the problems didn't exist in the first place and I believe they're addressing this even if it is not as fast as we'd prefer, but for the interim a free product from them to help protect us is a great idea.

Thumbs up, Microsoft.

RE: Comment by flanque
by Clinton on Wed 19th Nov 2008 03:38 in reply to "Comment by flanque"
Clinton Member since:
2005-07-05

I'm usually against Microsoft bundling crap with their OS because it is always designed to conquer that particular market; be it browsers, video players, whatever.

In this case, however, I think Microsoft should bundle security software. I think it is immoral to charge the prices they do for their OS and then expect somebody to fork out yet another $40 bucks to protect against security problems.

Unfortunately, I'm sure the companies like Symantec, who have made their fortunes fixing Microsoft's problems, won't be too keen on the idea.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 8

RE[2]: Comment by flanque
by tweakedenigma on Wed 19th Nov 2008 03:42 in reply to "RE: Comment by flanque"
tweakedenigma Member since:
2006-12-27

I gotta agree. I'm not a big Microsoft fan but this is something that should be included with Windows. Although I'm sure the Likes of Symantec and Mcafee will be tossing the word anti-trust around on this.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[2]: Comment by flanque
by Ventajou on Wed 19th Nov 2008 20:06 in reply to "RE: Comment by flanque"
Ventajou Member since:
2006-10-31

In the good old dos 6 days, they were giving a free AV with the system. IIRC it was a limited version of norton antivirus. So it wouldn't be the first time they did it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Comment by flanque
by Liquidator on Wed 19th Nov 2008 07:43 in reply to "Comment by flanque"
Liquidator Member since:
2007-03-04

Yes, it's a good move. Other companies are already offering free AV, so there's no unfair competition here. Those who want a paid AV can disable the native AV and use their own just fine. I hope this new MS AV updates automatically and daily for both legtimate and pirated copies of Windows because otherwise this isn't going to put a dent into botnet's installations. Remember that between 85 and 90% of spam is sent from a network of remotely controlled computers infected by malware around the world. It should take a few more years until everybody uses an updated antivirus.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[2]: Comment by flanque
by pepa on Thu 20th Nov 2008 17:05 in reply to "RE: Comment by flanque"
pepa Member since:
2005-07-08

Do you have some pointers about those figures for the origins of spam? I find it strange, because spam still needs to be sent through the SMTP servers of the ISP of an 'owned' computer.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2